Reads from Spring of 1998

Knowledge Is Wealth.
Share It.

line

yellow dotCurrently physically on my bedtable:

yellow dotLaura Ingalls Wilder (Set of Eight)

I might have written a blanket excuse about not listing rereadings back when I began these pages, but oh, these books should be sung from the rooftops (insert politically correct disclaimer). Sigh. This past Thanksgiving, as I stood at the sink washing waves of dishes and HAO, KKJ, and Christy kept me company, somehow Laura Ingalls Wilder came up. HAO knows better than to spar children's book trivia with me, and I think Christy hadn't read them (or prefers not to spar with me at all), but KKJ and I challenged each other back and forth and never has dishwashing been so fun. And since I was dishwashing for so many, naturally the church social in which Ida Brown, grateful adoptee, washed dishes and served attendees all day came up. Anyway, this Sunday in Boulder's used book stores with PSA, I found a complete set (The First Four Years doesn't count). If you loved Laura and her family, I recommend Dear Laura: Letters from Children to Laura Ingalls Wilder

yellow dotLaura Ingalls Wilder, ed., Dear Laura : Letters from Children to Laura Ingalls Wilder

Any devoted reader always wanted to know what happened next. When a child would write to Ms. Wilder and ask, she would tell them, until her arthritis made that too painful and she came up with a stock letter answering the basic questions. The one line I remember comes at the end of a paragraph telling the fates of family and friends: "They have all been dead for many years now." She outlived every one of the family we grew up with, including her younger sisters.

yellow dotRoald Dahl, Going Solo

When I was growing up, Danny, Champion of the World was more a favorite than Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. And The Great Glass Elevator was just weird. Finally I read James and the Giant Peach, and Tales of the Unexpected while in a dull summer cottage. I like Dahl and I like those bits of him others find intolerable. Discussing censorship in class, my publishing professor said she didn't like James and the Giant Peach because two little old ladies get creamed in the first chapter (and that despite this, she would never censor it). Censored or not, I had to come to the book's rescue: "But they were mean little old ladies [which my professor certainly was not] and James had two very nice parents too who just happened to get eaten by a rhinoceros."
Anyway. Consider the above why I'm fond of Dahl. Boy and Going Solo are two collections of autobiographical anecdotes; Going Solo flows more continuously as a novel. The nifty thing about Boy is that therein lie the seeds of many of his children's books. Going Solo is a good war story, conveying some gore, horror, and stupidity on a level children can understand without being emotionally scarred.
980422

yellow dot Tim O'Brien, The Things They Carried

RDC and I began to read these stories to each other on a long car trip, but it's taken me this long to finish them. Stories and ways of telling stories, honesty and honor. I would like to know more about the evolution of his stories, to see the organic process of the stories' development through versions and audiences and over time.
980419

yellow dotDorothy Allison, Skin

Bastard out of Carolina was one of the most powerful novels I've read in years, and the first essay in Skin, "A Question of Class," made me feel guilty about it in a way I hadn't before. I had felt survivor guilt for not having had to endure much of anything Bone did, grinding poverty, stepfather, or incest (social if not biological). I hadn't felt guilty for the sharp distinction I perceived between Bone's and my own social class, until the essay, which sparked an awareness of my own class-ism. Good essays.
980418

yellow dotHanif Kureshishi, The Buddha of Suburbia

Ehh. Almost as soon as I began the style seemed like Neal Stephenson's The Big U. RDC said it reminded him of Tom Robbins, whom HAO loves and whose Jitterbug Perfume got AFK eating beets (I think that's the one), but whom I have yet to endure a complete novel of (early PSA conditioning). Perhaps if I had more of a personal connection to the action, being either a suburban Londonite or cognizant in the early '70s, I would have found it more amusing. If I hadn't been in college when I found The Big U, same thing.
980420

yellow dotManlio Argueta, One Day of Life

The next book for the colloquium (such an odd-looking word, isn't it?). This was translated better than Mishima--maybe it's easier when both languages are in the same family? Or since it is American (but not Western, because third-world: imperialism again), perhaps it feels more familiar? Or perhaps it's the influence of Bill Ner/ric/cio* that I think all of my reactions must be imperialist merely because I am USAn. A teeter-totter of ideology. And I wrote "teeter-totter" for the sound; my own regionalism is "see-saw." Is "see-saw" derived from French at all, "comme ci, comme ça"? Leapin' lizards, look at her go. A few thoughts back, to wind up: Billy, whose last name had some variant number of r's and c's, arrived at UConn the youngest professor by far, under 30 although this wasn't even his first position. He shared an office with an Episcopalian priest. At least Felix and Oscar wound up friends. Billy taught third-world literature (one of his texts was "Friendly Dictator Trading Cards") and held office hours in a bar. Because he was pals with RJH (and roomies with the priest!) he knew the medievalists; he taught one class just before Chaucer (which I had) and one day scrawled a taunt on the chalkboard to the Chaucer professor about all medievalists being closet deconstructionists or something. He lasted, in that geriatric English department (which had had its share of spouse-swapping, to be sure, but twenty years before), two academic years and then scarpered for the less provincial air of San Diego.
980413

yellow dotDon DeLillo, White Noise

RDC quotes this book so frequently that I had to reread it. He doesn't remember things this way, but I do: the first day we played together (when he returned the favor and proposed back to me, seven months after I had to him), he was reading The Names and--hey, I don't remember what I was reading; something appropriate to demonstrate my intellectual prowess, I'm sure--and I knew DeLillo because I'd already read White Noise. Certainly he knows it better now than I do, but I did enjoy the rereading. Toyota Celica.
980409
980419 I introduced PSA to White Noise in a bookstore in Boulder. He sounded about ready to read it right then, but it'd make a big change from noh drama.

yellow dotYukio Mishima, The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea

I am sitting in on a colloquium on non-Western lit at DU. Mostly non-Western. Margaret Atwood and Michael Ondaatje are neither U.S. nor European, but Western they is. Anyway. I think this text suffered by its translation. It must read much more poetically in Japanese. How does a USAn read a non-Western text and refrain from assigning Western tenets to it? Is it imperialist or only realistic (or both) to assume that a well-educated Japanese author in the 1960s would have known about Freud?
The Japanese title translates as Tugboat Action in the Afternoon. Sing ho for idiom.
980405

yellow dotTennessee Williams, Suddenly, Last Summer

Because I recently watched the Kate-n-Liz cinematization on TCM. A word of advice: don't take your co-dependent, non-reading, close-minded mother to Tennessee Williams plays. CLH and I individually and without malice aforethought brought our mother to "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" and "A Streetcar Named Desire," respectively. Overall I think my choice was worse, but perhaps only because I don't know the former. Perhaps when CLH and I both live in the Bay Area and BJWL visits us (in passing on the way to her in-laws in charming Fresno) we can take her to "The Glass Menagerie."

yellow dot Margaret Atwood, Alias Grace

I first read this in January of 1997, when it was published; this time I read it for the above colloquium. I enjoyed more of its angles and depths this time, even as it made me aware what lazy reader I am.
980504

yellow dotCynthia Voigt, Bad, Badder, Baddest

This is weaker than Bad Girls, which isn't surprising since Bad Girls, as far as I'm concerned, is one of the finest crafted contemporary children's books I have read. However. Characters contradict themselves and their past behavior, which is a sort of inconsistency I can't bear and consider nearly a betrayal. After a bad day in Bad Girls, Mikey wants to go home and watch "101 Dalmatians" for the eleventy-first time; in Bad, Badder, Baddest, she claims to despise now and to have always despised all Disney flicks.
Overall, I think what might have happened here is what happened for Voigt in Sons from Afar. Well, no, that doesn't work. In Sons from Afar, neither James nor Sammy were strong, nay, credible, without Dicey or Gram in the foreground. I always found them three-dimensional in those books where Dicey starred, but on their own, they didn't work. So the analogy doesn't work for Bad, Badder, Baddest, because Mikey and Margalo were just fine on their own in Bad Girls. Perhaps because the tantalizing hints from Bad Girls of their worlds outside school are now fleshed out but cartoon-like.
In sum, Voigt is going to have to do a lot worse than this before she loses me as a fervent reader, but nor would I have become the fan I am if this was her usual.
980505

yellow dot Haruki Murakami, Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World

Fairly bizarre, this. Another colloquium book, this one fitting the requirements. Unnamed characters keep the reader at a distance. Translation mars the idiom, again and of course. I want to read more Murakami; I don't want to read any more Mishima. If that tells you anything.
980519

yellow dotJ.M. Coetzee, Foe

What if a woman had shipwrecked on an island with a suppposedly civilized white-skinned man named Crusoe and another, supposedly savage brown-skinned man named Friday, and Crusoe was a heel, and then all three of them were rescued, and afterward she told her story to an author named Foe, and he rewrote her story to make it more interesting, leaving her out of it completely?

yellow dotMichael Ondaatje, The Collected Works of Billy the Kid

yellow dot Judy Blume, Summer Sisters

This is the first of her adult novels I have read. Seeing her in person, reading her website, and reading one of her books for the first time as an adult, all make me realize what a weak writer she is. That does not, mind you, detract one whit from the good her books did me as a child. To wit: I arrived at the Tattered Cover and sat in the third row next to a woman who looked friendly, but mostly I just wanted to sit fairly close. But being the tigger I am, I turned to this stranger and asked, "So which one is your favorite?" By the end of the night, Marietta and I were pals. We had shared the Judy Blume experience, natch. I didn't know that "period" could mean anything other than punctuation when I began to read Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret. I had no idea what Joel was underlining in those books of his in Then Again Maybe I Won't. Judy Blume helped me through all that. And that's the kind of thing Marietta and I talked about. Except it all started when she ended a comment with "…it's endless" and I added "it's a total drag" and she recognized the line as from "The Breakfast Club." So when we stood in line to have our books signed, we told Judy Blume that common love of her had made us friends in the course of the evening (we didn't mention John Hughes's and the Brat Pack's help). And that, more than any current book, is what Ms. Blume means to me.
980528

yellow dot Cormac McCarthy, The Crossing

"Before him the mountains were blinding white in the sun. They looked new born out of the hand of some improvident god who'd perhaps not even puzzled out a use for them."
Cormac McCarthy, The Crossing (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994), p. 31
980530

yellow dot John Leonard, Smoke and Mirrors

Published by a small, independent press, lacking any hint of index or thesis, full of vintage Leonard turns of speech and literary allusion, poorly copyedited, this rambling discussion of television and its culture is an excellent read.
980605

yellow dot Katherine Dunn, Geek Love

Except for the denouement of the framing story, this is a great novel. A more bizarre set of characters I challenge any novelist to produce. I shall never again misuse the word "geek" to mean "academically skilled but socially challenged person." Unless the person geeks on the side, of course.

'When your mama was the geek, my dreamlets," Papa would say, "she made the nipping off of noggins such a crystal mystery that the hens themselves yearned toward her, waltzing around her, hypnotized with longing. 'Spread your lips, Sweet Lil,' they'd cluck, 'and show us your choppers!'"
p. 3

Watching her work is comfortable. I feel invisible again, as though she had never spoken to me beyond, "Good morning." She is not interested in my identity. She doesn't notice it. Her eyes flick impatiently at me for a fast fix--a regenerative fusing of the image on her retina, the model she inflicts on the paper. I am merely a utensil, a temporary pic for the eternal discussion between her long eye and her deliberate hand.
p. 30

Go to previous or next season, Reading Index, Books, Words, or the Lisa Index.

Last modified 19 July 1998

Speak your mind: lisawherepenguindustdashcom

Copyright © 1998, 1999 LJH