Colorado resident Temple Grandin got a fair bit of press a couple of years ago for Animals in Translation: Using the Mysteries of Autism to Decode Animal Behavior, so I picked it up. I've read about 50 pages and that's enough. I feel bad because maybe her writing style is a function of her autism, and therefore to dislike the style is to be mean to her autism. I'm content just to feel stupid about feeling bad because I know that I am, in fact, not being mean.
She tells the reader that cows don't like yellow. Okay. She doesn't need to say that another three times in those first 50 pages, does she? Not only the same fact (or observation) repeated over a few score of pages but in the same paragraph as well:
(An interesting idea, but anecdotal; also, animals perhaps don't have developmental disabilities because humans are (sometimes) humane and don't let the imperfect die, as animals must do.)
Furthermore, it's irritatingly memoir-esque and chatty and I don't need every last item spelled out in words of one syllable.