|
We spent the day petting buddy's head, doing laundry (except for the sleeping bags), petting buddy's head, airing the tent, petting buddy's head, cleaning the bikes (desiccated bug graveyards), petting buddy's head, and dozing.
One of the previews coming soon to a theatre near me mentioned a young woman sent to live with wealthy relatives--and immediately I flinched. I knew it had to be done; it's the only major novel not yet recently cinematized--but to hear Fanny Price described as a spirited young woman? A major divergence from Mansfield Park, one that overturns the delicate balance of character Austen constructs. And Edmund with a hint of wanting to marry a Price before he knows he can't marry a Crawford? Ha! It's obvious from the second chapter that Fanny will marry Edmund and no other, but Fanny herself does nothing to prevent his falling in love elsewhere, let alone do anything to encourage his falling in love with her, let further alone Edmund having any hint of it. Nevertheless I shall see it. I like both "Emmas" despite their glaring inconsistencies. "Pride and Prejudice" might be the first DVD I own, when and if. "Persuasion" and "Sense and Sensibility" were the best of the most recent versions overall, and when "Persuasion" came out it was obvious a "Mansfield Park" couldn't be long behind. The only reason it could be this far behind the wave of Austens recently screened is that no one could figure out how to make Fanny appealing. The feature presentation that RDC guessed was "Shakespeare in Love," which remains right up there with "Philadelphia Story" for me. |
Go to previous or next, the Journal Index, Words, or the Lisa Index
Last modified 26 August 1999
Speak your mind: lisawherepenguindustdashcom
Copyright © 1999 LJH